|
Tournoi du 30-09-13
1 60,19 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 55,93 7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
~ 55,93 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
4 52,22 5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse
5 51,85 6 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques
6 48,52 3 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
7 47,04 10 MEUNIER -PAQUET Anne
8 46,48 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
9 43,15 4 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine
10 38,70 9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 64,63 18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 55,74 12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
3 54,07 19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
4 52,41 17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 50,37 13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
~ 50,37 11 MEYER Jean -COLINET Eric
7 45,74 15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
8 42,96 20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS
9 42,78 14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel
10 40,93 16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
PAIRE Nr : 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
11 MEYER Jean -COLINET Eric : 50,37 % 1 NS 3K E+1 -130 10 55.56
2 NS 2S S = 120 18 100.00
3 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 50,37 % 4 NS 2C N+1 140 9 50.00
5 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44
6 NS 6S S+1 1020 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,74 % 7 NS 4C E = -620 5 27.78
8 NS 4CcS-1 -100 1 5.56
9 NS 2P W-2 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,93 %10 NS 3S W+1 -630 11 61.11
11 NS 2S S-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 2S E = -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 %13 NS 3S S+2 660 16 88.89
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78
15 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 %16 NS 4C E-2 200 17 94.44
17 NS 4P W-2 100 14 77.78
18 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,07 %19 NS 3S S+4 520 15 83.33
20 NS 3T N-2 -200 1 5.56
21 NS 3PcE-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS : 42,96 %22 NS 4P S = 420 14 77.78
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 44.44
24 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 42,78 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 NS 3T N-1 -100 14 77.78
27 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,74 %28 NS 2K N+2 130 14 77.78
29 NS 6S W-3 300 18 100.00
30 NS 4C S = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 302,0 / 540 = 55,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 50,37 % 1 NS 3KcW+1 -570 2 11.11
2 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.56
3 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,74 % 4 NS 1P E-1 100 0 0.00
5 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 11.11
6 NS 7S S = 1520 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 MEYER Jean -COLINET Eric : 50,37 % 7 NS 4C E = -620 5 27.78
8 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11
9 NS 3CcN-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS : 42,96 %10 NS 3S W+1 -630 11 61.11
11 NS 3P S-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 2S E = -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 42,78 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78
15 NS 3C W+1 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,74 %16 NS 2S W-2 200 17 94.44
17 NS 2P W = -110 1 5.56
18 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,93 %19 NS 3S S+4 520 15 83.33
20 NS 1S E-1 100 9 50.00
21 NS 2P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 %22 NS 4P S = 420 14 77.78
23 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00
24 NS 2S S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 %25 NS 1S E = -90 0 0.00
26 NS 2T N-1 -100 14 77.78
27 NS 3T S+1 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,07 %28 NS 2S N-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
30 NS 1CcS+3 460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,74 % 1 NS 3C E-2 100 18 100.00
2 NS 2K E+1 -110 1 5.56
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
11 MEYER Jean -COLINET Eric : 50,37 % 4 NS 2KcE-2 500 18 100.00
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 44.44
6 NS 6C N+1 1010 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 50,37 % 7 NS 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67
8 NS 3C N-1 -50 5 27.78
9 NS 3C E-2 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 %10 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22
11 NS 2C S = 110 12 66.67
12 NS 2P N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,07 %13 NS 3S N = 600 11 61.11
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78
15 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS : 42,96 %16 NS 2S W-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 3P W-1 50 9 50.00
18 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 42,78 %19 NS 3S S = 400 0 0.00
20 NS 1S E-1 100 9 50.00
21 NS 2P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,74 %22 NS 3P S+1 170 7 38.89
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 44.44
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,93 %25 NS 4P N = 420 16 88.89
26 NS 2T N-1 -100 14 77.78
27 NS 3S N+2 460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 %28 NS 2S N = 120 10 55.56
29 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
30 NS 3C S+1 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 % 1 NS 3ScN-5 -1100 0 0.00
2 NS 3K W-1 50 12 66.67
3 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,93 % 4 NS 2P E-2 200 16 88.89
5 NS 4P E-1 50 16 88.89
6 NS 3S S+4 520 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,74 % 7 NS 4C E = -620 5 27.78
8 NS 2C S+2 170 18 100.00
9 NS 5T S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 42,78 %10 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22
11 NS 2C S+1 140 17 94.44
12 NS 3T S-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS : 42,96 %13 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 11.11
14 NS 2P S = 110 10 55.56
15 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,07 %16 NS 3C E = -140 2 11.11
17 NS 4P S-2 -100 4 22.22
18 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 3 16.67
20 NS 1S E-1 100 9 50.00
21 NS 3T S-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 50,37 %22 NS 4P S = 420 14 77.78
23 NS 3C S-5 -500 0 0.00
24 NS 2P E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,74 %25 NS 3P N = 140 14 77.78
26 NS 1P E+2 -140 5 27.78
27 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 MEYER Jean -COLINET Eric : 50,37 %28 NS 2C S = 110 6 33.33
29 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
30 NS 4C S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 233,0 / 540 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 % 1 NS 2S N-5 -250 6 33.33
2 NS Pass Passe 9 50.00
3 NS 3S E-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 % 4 NS 3C N = 140 9 50.00
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 44.44
6 NS 7C N = 1510 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,93 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 5 27.78
8 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11
9 NS 3PcE-1 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 MEYER Jean -COLINET Eric : 50,37 %10 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
11 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,74 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 33.33
14 NS 4P S = 420 15 83.33
15 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 42,78 %16 NS 2C E = -110 4 22.22
17 NS 2P W = -110 1 5.56
18 NS 2S S = 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS : 42,96 %19 NS 3S S+3 490 8 44.44
20 NS 1S E-2 200 15 83.33
21 NS 3P E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,07 %22 NS 2P S+1 140 4 22.22
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 44.44
24 NS 2P E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 50,37 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 NS 3T N-1 -100 14 77.78
27 NS 3S N+2 460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,74 %28 NS 1S N+3 180 18 100.00
29 NS 2C E+2 -170 10 55.56
30 NS 3K W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 282,0 / 540 = 52,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,07 % 1 NS 2PcN-2 -300 4 22.22
2 NS Pass Passe 9 50.00
3 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 % 4 NS 2S N+2 180 14 77.78
5 NS 4P W = -420 0 0.00
6 NS 7S N = 1520 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 5 27.78
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 5 27.78
9 NS 2P E-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,74 %10 NS 1S E = -90 18 100.00
11 NS 2K W-1 50 10 55.56
12 NS 2S E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
11 MEYER Jean -COLINET Eric : 50,37 %13 NS 3S N = 600 11 61.11
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78
15 NS 3C W+1 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,93 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 3P W-1 50 9 50.00
18 NS 4C S = 620 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,74 %19 NS 3S S+4 520 15 83.33
20 NS 1S W-1 100 9 50.00
21 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 42,78 %22 NS 4P S = 420 14 77.78
23 NS 1S S+1 120 15 83.33
24 NS 3K S+1 130 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS : 42,96 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 NS 2S W = -120 8 44.44
27 NS 3S S+1 430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 50,37 %28 NS 2S N-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 5.56
30 NS 2C S+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 280,0 / 540 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS : 42,96 % 1 NS 3S N-3 -150 8 44.44
2 NS 2T S-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 2K E+3 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,07 % 4 NS 1S S+1 120 4 22.22
5 NS 2P E = -110 14 77.78
6 NS 6S S+1 1020 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 5 27.78
8 NS 4C S-2 -100 1 5.56
9 NS 3P E-2 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 50,37 %10 NS 3S W+1 -630 11 61.11
11 NS 2S S = 120 14 77.78
12 NS 2S E = -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,74 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 33.33
14 NS 3P S+1 170 12 66.67
15 NS 3C W+1 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
11 MEYER Jean -COLINET Eric : 50,37 %16 NS 3C E-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 3P W-1 50 9 50.00
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 %19 NS 3S S+4 520 15 83.33
20 NS 2C E-2 200 15 83.33
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,93 %22 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 11.11
23 NS 1S S+1 120 15 83.33
24 NS 3T N+1 130 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,74 %25 NS 5TcE-2 500 18 100.00
26 NS 2C N-1 -100 14 77.78
27 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 42,78 %28 NS 2S N = 120 10 55.56
29 NS 3S W-2 200 15 83.33
30 NS 4C S = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 302,0 / 540 = 55,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 42,78 % 1 NS 2P S-1 -50 16 88.89
2 NS 1S S = 90 15 83.33
3 NS 3K E+1 -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS : 42,96 % 4 NS 1S S+1 120 4 22.22
5 NS 3C E-2 100 18 100.00
6 NS 6C N+1 1010 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,07 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 16 88.89
8 NS 2C S+1 140 15 83.33
9 NS 3P W-3 300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,74 %10 NS 2CcS-4 -1100 0 0.00
11 NS 3P S = 140 17 94.44
12 NS 3T S-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 50,37 %13 NS 2PcW-4 1100 18 100.00
14 NS 4P S+2 480 18 100.00
15 NS 4PcN-1 -200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,74 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 2T N+1 110 16 88.89
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 MEYER Jean -COLINET Eric : 50,37 %19 NS 3S S+3 490 8 44.44
20 NS 1S E-4 400 18 100.00
21 NS 2P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 %22 NS 3P S+1 170 7 38.89
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 44.44
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 NS 3S S-3 -300 0 0.00
27 NS 3S N+2 460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,93 %28 NS 2S N = 120 10 55.56
29 NS 6S W-1 100 12 66.67
30 NS 2C S+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 325,0 / 540 = 60,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,74 % 1 NS 3K W = -110 14 77.78
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 42,78 % 4 NS 1S S+1 120 4 22.22
5 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44
6 NS 6S N+1 1020 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS : 42,96 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 16 88.89
8 NS 2C S+1 140 15 83.33
9 NS 3P W-3 300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 %10 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 22.22
11 NS 4P N-2 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 2S E = -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,93 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 33.33
14 NS 4P S = 420 15 83.33
15 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 50,37 %16 NS 3C E-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 3P W-1 50 9 50.00
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,74 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 3 16.67
20 NS 3T S-2 -200 1 5.56
21 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
11 MEYER Jean -COLINET Eric : 50,37 %22 NS 4P S = 420 14 77.78
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 44.44
24 NS 1S S+1 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,07 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 NS 4C S-2 -200 2 11.11
27 NS 3T S+2 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 %28 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 5.56
30 NS 4T N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
Total : 209,0 / 540 = 38,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MEUNIER -PAQUET Anne
16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,93 % 1 NS 2S W = -120 12 66.67
2 NS 2T S = 90 15 83.33
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,74 % 4 NS 1S S+2 150 12 66.67
5 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44
6 NS 7S S = 1520 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 42,78 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 16 88.89
8 NS 4K E-2 100 8 44.44
9 NS 3K S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,07 %10 NS 1S E+3 -180 16 88.89
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 2S E = -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 64,63 %13 NS 4C S-3 -300 0 0.00
14 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00
15 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 %16 NS 2PcS-2 -300 0 0.00
17 NS 3T N+1 130 18 100.00
18 NS 3S S+1 630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 50,37 %19 NS 3S S+3 490 8 44.44
20 NS 1S N-1 -100 4 22.22
21 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,74 %22 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 5T S-2 -200 2 11.11
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
11 MEYER Jean -COLINET Eric : 50,37 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 NS 1P E+2 -140 5 27.78
27 NS 3S N+1 430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS : 42,96 %28 NS 2S N+1 150 16 88.89
29 NS 3S W-2 200 15 83.33
30 NS 4C S = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 254,0 / 540 = 47,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 MEYER Jean -COLINET Eric
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,93 % 1 EO 3K E+1 -130 8 44.44
2 EO 2S S = 120 0 0.00
3 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 % 4 EO 2KcE-2 500 0 0.00
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 10 55.56
6 EO 6C N+1 1010 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,48 % 7 EO 4C E = -620 13 72.22
8 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89
9 EO 3CcN-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,22 %10 EO 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
11 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 %13 EO 3S N = 600 7 38.89
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22
15 EO 3C W+1 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 55,93 %16 EO 3C E-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 3P W-1 50 9 50.00
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,19 %19 EO 3S S+3 490 10 55.56
20 EO 1S E-4 400 0 0.00
21 EO 2P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,70 %22 EO 4P S = 420 4 22.22
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 55.56
24 EO 1S S+1 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
10 MEUNIER -PAQUET Anne : 47,04 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 EO 1P E+2 -140 13 72.22
27 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 43,15 %28 EO 2C S = 110 12 66.67
29 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
30 EO 4C S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
3 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 % 1 EO 3C E-2 100 0 0.00
2 EO 2K E+1 -110 17 94.44
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,48 % 4 EO 1P E-1 100 18 100.00
5 EO 2P E+2 -170 16 88.89
6 EO 7S S = 1520 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,93 % 7 EO 4C E = -620 13 72.22
8 EO 4CcS-1 -100 17 94.44
9 EO 2P W-2 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 %10 EO 1S E = -90 0 0.00
11 EO 2K W-1 50 8 44.44
12 EO 2S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 55,93 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 12 66.67
14 EO 3P S+1 170 6 33.33
15 EO 3C W+1 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,19 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 2T N+1 110 2 11.11
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,70 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 15 83.33
20 EO 3T S-2 -200 17 94.44
21 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
10 MEUNIER -PAQUET Anne : 47,04 %22 EO 3S S-2 -100 18 100.00
23 EO 5T S-2 -200 16 88.89
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 43,15 %25 EO 3P N = 140 4 22.22
26 EO 1P E+2 -140 13 72.22
27 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,22 %28 EO 1S N+3 180 0 0.00
29 EO 2C E+2 -170 8 44.44
30 EO 3K W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 301,0 / 540 = 55,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,48 % 1 EO 3KcW+1 -570 16 88.89
2 EO 2C W = -110 17 94.44
3 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,93 % 4 EO 2C N+1 140 9 50.00
5 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56
6 EO 6S S+1 1020 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 % 7 EO 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33
8 EO 3C N-1 -50 13 72.22
9 EO 3C E-2 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 55,93 %10 EO 3S W+1 -630 7 38.89
11 EO 2S S = 120 4 22.22
12 EO 2S E = -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,19 %13 EO 2PcW-4 1100 0 0.00
14 EO 4P S+2 480 0 0.00
15 EO 4PcN-1 -200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,70 %16 EO 3C E-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 3P W-1 50 9 50.00
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
10 MEUNIER -PAQUET Anne : 47,04 %19 EO 3S S+3 490 10 55.56
20 EO 1S N-1 -100 14 77.78
21 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 43,15 %22 EO 4P S = 420 4 22.22
23 EO 3C S-5 -500 18 100.00
24 EO 2P E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,22 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 EO 3T N-1 -100 4 22.22
27 EO 3S N+2 460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 %28 EO 2S N-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 17 94.44
30 EO 2C S+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -MASSAUX Joel
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,19 % 1 EO 2P S-1 -50 2 11.11
2 EO 1S S = 90 3 16.67
3 EO 3K E+1 -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,70 % 4 EO 1S S+1 120 14 77.78
5 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56
6 EO 6S N+1 1020 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 MEUNIER -PAQUET Anne : 47,04 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 2 11.11
8 EO 4K E-2 100 10 55.56
9 EO 3K S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 43,15 %10 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78
11 EO 2C S+1 140 1 5.56
12 EO 3T S-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,48 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22
15 EO 3C W+1 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,22 %16 EO 2C E = -110 14 77.78
17 EO 2P W = -110 17 94.44
18 EO 2S S = 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
3 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 %19 EO 3S S = 400 18 100.00
20 EO 1S E-1 100 9 50.00
21 EO 2P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 %22 EO 4P S = 420 4 22.22
23 EO 1S S+1 120 3 16.67
24 EO 3K S+1 130 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,93 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 EO 3T N-1 -100 4 22.22
27 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 55,93 %28 EO 2S N = 120 8 44.44
29 EO 3S W-2 200 3 16.67
30 EO 4C S = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 231,0 / 540 = 42,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,70 % 1 EO 3K W = -110 4 22.22
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 MEUNIER -PAQUET Anne : 47,04 % 4 EO 1S S+2 150 6 33.33
5 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56
6 EO 7S S = 1520 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 43,15 % 7 EO 4C E = -620 13 72.22
8 EO 2C S+2 170 0 0.00
9 EO 5T S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,19 %10 EO 2CcS-4 -1100 18 100.00
11 EO 3P S = 140 1 5.56
12 EO 3T S-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,22 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 12 66.67
14 EO 4P S = 420 3 16.67
15 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,48 %16 EO 2S W-2 200 1 5.56
17 EO 2P W = -110 17 94.44
18 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 %19 EO 3S S+4 520 3 16.67
20 EO 1S W-1 100 9 50.00
21 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 %22 EO 3P S+1 170 11 61.11
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 10 55.56
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 55,93 %25 EO 5TcE-2 500 0 0.00
26 EO 2C N-1 -100 4 22.22
27 EO 3S N+1 430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,93 %28 EO 2K N+2 130 4 22.22
29 EO 6S W-3 300 0 0.00
30 EO 4C S = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 247,0 / 540 = 45,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
10 MEUNIER -PAQUET Anne : 47,04 % 1 EO 2S W = -120 6 33.33
2 EO 2T S = 90 3 16.67
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 43,15 % 4 EO 2P E-2 200 2 11.11
5 EO 4P E-1 50 2 11.11
6 EO 3S S+4 520 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,22 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 13 72.22
8 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89
9 EO 3PcE-1 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,93 %10 EO 3S W+1 -630 7 38.89
11 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 2S E = -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,70 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 12 66.67
14 EO 4P S = 420 3 16.67
15 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 3P W-1 50 9 50.00
18 EO 4C S = 620 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,48 %19 EO 3S S+4 520 3 16.67
20 EO 1S E-1 100 9 50.00
21 EO 2P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 55,93 %22 EO 4P S-1 -50 16 88.89
23 EO 1S S+1 120 3 16.67
24 EO 3T N+1 130 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 %25 EO 4P N = 420 2 11.11
26 EO 2T N-1 -100 4 22.22
27 EO 3S N+2 460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,19 %28 EO 2S N = 120 8 44.44
29 EO 6S W-1 100 6 33.33
30 EO 2C S+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 221,0 / 540 = 40,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 43,15 % 1 EO 3ScN-5 -1100 18 100.00
2 EO 3K W-1 50 6 33.33
3 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,22 % 4 EO 3C N = 140 9 50.00
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 10 55.56
6 EO 7C N = 1510 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 13 72.22
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 13 72.22
9 EO 2P E-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,70 %10 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 77.78
11 EO 4P N-2 -100 18 100.00
12 EO 2S E = -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,93 %13 EO 3S S+2 660 2 11.11
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22
15 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 MEUNIER -PAQUET Anne : 47,04 %16 EO 2PcS-2 -300 18 100.00
17 EO 3T N+1 130 0 0.00
18 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 55,93 %19 EO 3S S+4 520 3 16.67
20 EO 2C E-2 200 3 16.67
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,48 %22 EO 4P S = 420 4 22.22
23 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
24 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,19 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 EO 3S S-3 -300 18 100.00
27 EO 3S N+2 460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
3 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 %28 EO 2S N = 120 8 44.44
29 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
30 EO 3C S+1 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,22 % 1 EO 2S N-5 -250 12 66.67
2 EO Pass Passe 9 50.00
3 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 % 4 EO 2S N+2 180 4 22.22
5 EO 4P W = -420 18 100.00
6 EO 7S N = 1520 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 55,93 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 13 72.22
8 EO 4C S-2 -100 17 94.44
9 EO 3P E-2 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 %10 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78
11 EO 2C S = 110 6 33.33
12 EO 2P N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
10 MEUNIER -PAQUET Anne : 47,04 %13 EO 4C S-3 -300 18 100.00
14 EO 4P S-2 -100 18 100.00
15 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,93 %16 EO 4C E-2 200 1 5.56
17 EO 4P W-2 100 4 22.22
18 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 43,15 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 15 83.33
20 EO 1S E-1 100 9 50.00
21 EO 3T S-4 -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,19 %22 EO 3P S+1 170 11 61.11
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 55.56
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,48 %25 EO 1S E = -90 18 100.00
26 EO 2T N-1 -100 4 22.22
27 EO 3T S+1 130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,70 %28 EO 3S N-3 -300 18 100.00
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 94.44
30 EO 4T N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
Total : 349,0 / 540 = 64,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
6 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 % 1 EO 2PcN-2 -300 14 77.78
2 EO Pass Passe 9 50.00
3 EO 3S W+2 -660 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 55,93 % 4 EO 1S S+1 120 14 77.78
5 EO 2P E = -110 4 22.22
6 EO 6S S+1 1020 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,19 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 2 11.11
8 EO 2C S+1 140 3 16.67
9 EO 3P W-3 300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
10 MEUNIER -PAQUET Anne : 47,04 %10 EO 1S E+3 -180 2 11.11
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 2S E = -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 %13 EO 3S N = 600 7 38.89
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22
15 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 43,15 %16 EO 3C E = -140 16 88.89
17 EO 4P S-2 -100 14 77.78
18 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,93 %19 EO 3S S+4 520 3 16.67
20 EO 3T N-2 -200 17 94.44
21 EO 3PcE-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,22 %22 EO 2P S+1 140 14 77.78
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 55.56
24 EO 2P E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,70 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 EO 4C S-2 -200 16 88.89
27 EO 3T S+2 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,48 %28 EO 2S N-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
30 EO 1CcS+3 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 292,0 / 540 = 54,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS
7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 55,93 % 1 EO 3S N-3 -150 10 55.56
2 EO 2T S-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 2K E+3 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,19 % 4 EO 1S S+1 120 14 77.78
5 EO 3C E-2 100 0 0.00
6 EO 6C N+1 1010 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 38,70 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 2 11.11
8 EO 2C S+1 140 3 16.67
9 EO 3P W-3 300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,48 %10 EO 3S W+1 -630 7 38.89
11 EO 3P S-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 2S E = -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 43,15 %13 EO 3S S-2 -200 16 88.89
14 EO 2P S = 110 8 44.44
15 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 STEED Adrian -COULIE Joelle : 48,52 %16 EO 2S W-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 3P W-1 50 9 50.00
18 EO 3S S+1 630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,22 %19 EO 3S S+3 490 10 55.56
20 EO 1S E-2 200 3 16.67
21 EO 3P E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,93 %22 EO 4P S = 420 4 22.22
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 55.56
24 EO 3S N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 EO 2S W = -120 10 55.56
27 EO 3S S+1 430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 MEUNIER -PAQUET Anne : 47,04 %28 EO 2S N+1 150 2 11.11
29 EO 3S W-2 200 3 16.67
30 EO 4C S = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
|
|