|
Tournoi du 30-12-13
1 58,33 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
2 57,78 4 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline
3 56,85 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
4 53,52 11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 51,48 5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 50,19 10 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile
7 49,26 2 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse
8 48,89 6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
9 47,04 9 LIGOT Xavier -NELIS Anne
10 46,67 3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
11 30,00 7 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 66,85 13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
2 55,93 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 55,00 14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 54,44 22 COULIE Joelle -WANDERPEPEN Janine
5 49,44 20 CHANTRAINE René -MACAUX Lucienne
6 49,07 16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
7 46,67 21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
8 44,81 12 VAGMAN David -NELIS Claude
9 44,63 19 HRISTOV Petko -VELIKOVA Rouja
10 43,15 18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
11 40,00 17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
12 VAGMAN David -NELIS Claude : 44,81 % 1 NS 1ScW-2 300 18 100.00
2 NS 1T E-3 150 17 94.44
3 NS 1S S+3 180 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
22 COULIE Joelle -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,44 % 4 NS 3K E-1 100 10 55.56
5 NS 2CcW = -470 2 11.11
6 NS 2C N+1 140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,67 % 7 NS 4P N+2 680 2 11.11
8 NS 2P W = -110 9 50.00
9 NS 1P E+3 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -MACAUX Lucienne : 49,44 %10 NS 2C N+2 170 14 77.78
11 NS 1S W-3 150 18 100.00
12 NS 1S S = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
19 HRISTOV Petko -VELIKOVA Rouja : 44,63 %13 NS 4P N-1 -100 8 44.44
14 NS 4C E = -420 8 44.44
15 NS 3P W-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,15 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 15 83.33
17 NS 6S N = 990 18 100.00
18 NS 4C E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 40,00 %19 NS 3P W-3 300 18 100.00
20 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 27.78
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,07 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 3 16.67
23 NS 3K W = -110 11 61.11
24 NS 3T E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 %25 NS 2C N = 110 6 33.33
26 NS 2P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 %28 NS 2P N+2 170 3 16.67
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 12 66.67
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 315,0 / 540 = 58,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 66,85 % 4 NS 2CcE = -670 2 11.11
5 NS 2C W+1 -140 7 38.89
6 NS 2C N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
12 VAGMAN David -NELIS Claude : 44,81 % 7 NS 4P N+3 710 8 44.44
8 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 16.67
9 NS 3K N-3 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
22 COULIE Joelle -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,44 %10 NS 3C S = 140 7 38.89
11 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
12 NS 3K N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,67 %13 NS 4P N = 620 16 88.89
14 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00
15 NS 4P E-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -MACAUX Lucienne : 49,44 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
17 NS 3S N+3 490 16 88.89
18 NS 3S E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
19 HRISTOV Petko -VELIKOVA Rouja : 44,63 %19 NS 2S E = -120 10 55.56
20 NS 2P E-2 200 18 100.00
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,15 %22 NS 3C W+2 -200 14 77.78
23 NS 4T W = -130 7 38.89
24 NS 2S E = -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 40,00 %25 NS 2P S+1 140 15 83.33
26 NS 2P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,07 %28 NS 4P N+1 650 15 83.33
29 NS 2P S-2 -200 5 27.78
30 NS 2P E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 %31 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
32 NS 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78
33 NS 3S W = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,07 % 1 NS 3P N-2 -100 7 38.89
2 NS 1T E-3 150 17 94.44
3 NS 3K S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 % 7 NS 5P S+2 710 8 44.44
8 NS 4P W-3 150 18 100.00
9 NS 3K S-3 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 66,85 %10 NS 1S W = -90 3 16.67
11 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
12 NS 2C E = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
12 VAGMAN David -NELIS Claude : 44,81 %13 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22
15 NS 2P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
22 COULIE Joelle -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,44 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
17 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
18 NS 4C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,67 %19 NS 3C W-2 200 16 88.89
20 NS 2C W = -110 13 72.22
21 NS 5P E+1 -480 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -MACAUX Lucienne : 49,44 %22 NS 4C W = -620 9 50.00
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 3 16.67
24 NS 3T E = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 HRISTOV Petko -VELIKOVA Rouja : 44,63 %25 NS 2P S = 110 6 33.33
26 NS 2P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,15 %28 NS 1S S+1 120 0 0.00
29 NS 3S W-3 300 17 94.44
30 NS 3S W = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 40,00 %31 NS 1P W+2 -140 2 11.11
32 NS 4C E-1 100 16 88.89
33 NS 2K E+1 -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,15 % 1 NS 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22
2 NS 2K S+1 110 12 66.67
3 NS 3S N = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 40,00 % 4 NS 3K E-2 200 18 100.00
5 NS 2T S-1 -100 10 55.56
6 NS 3C N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 %10 NS 2C S+2 170 14 77.78
11 NS 2C N-2 -100 13 72.22
12 NS 3K N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 %13 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 11.11
14 NS 3S W = -400 10 55.56
15 NS 3P W-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 66,85 %16 NS 3S S = 400 2 11.11
17 NS 5K N = 400 2 11.11
18 NS 3C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
12 VAGMAN David -NELIS Claude : 44,81 %19 NS 2P W-1 100 13 72.22
20 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 27.78
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
22 COULIE Joelle -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,44 %22 NS 4C W = -620 9 50.00
23 NS 5KcW-2 500 18 100.00
24 NS 1S E = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,67 %25 NS 2P S = 110 6 33.33
26 NS 2P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 NS 2S W+2 -180 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -MACAUX Lucienne : 49,44 %28 NS 4P S+1 650 15 83.33
29 NS 3T S-2 -200 5 27.78
30 NS 3K E+2 -150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 HRISTOV Petko -VELIKOVA Rouja : 44,63 %31 NS 1S S+1 120 18 100.00
32 NS 3PcS-1 -100 13 72.22
33 NS 3K E+1 -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
Total : 312,0 / 540 = 57,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
20 CHANTRAINE René -MACAUX Lucienne : 49,44 % 1 NS 2K N-2 -100 7 38.89
2 NS 1S N+1 120 14 77.78
3 NS 3K S+1 130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 HRISTOV Petko -VELIKOVA Rouja : 44,63 % 4 NS 3CcE = -730 0 0.00
5 NS 3CcW-1 100 14 77.78
6 NS 2C N = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,15 % 7 NS 6P N = 1430 12 66.67
8 NS 3PcW-1 100 15 83.33
9 NS 2P E+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,07 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 44.44
14 NS 3S W-1 50 16 88.89
15 NS 3S N-3 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
17 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
18 NS 3C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 %19 NS 4K S-3 -150 7 38.89
20 NS 2C W = -110 13 72.22
21 NS 4P E+2 -480 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 66,85 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 3 16.67
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
24 NS 2C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
12 VAGMAN David -NELIS Claude : 44,81 %25 NS 2P S+1 140 15 83.33
26 NS 3T S+1 130 17 94.44
27 NS 4P W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
22 COULIE Joelle -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,44 %28 NS 2P N+4 230 8 44.44
29 NS 3T S-4 -400 0 0.00
30 NS 2K E+1 -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,67 %31 NS 2S N-1 -100 8 44.44
32 NS 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78
33 NS 3K E+2 -150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 278,0 / 540 = 51,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
22 COULIE Joelle -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,44 % 1 NS 4C N-2 -100 7 38.89
2 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 1S S+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,67 % 4 NS 3K E-1 100 10 55.56
5 NS 2C W-1 50 12 66.67
6 NS 3C N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -MACAUX Lucienne : 49,44 % 7 NS 6P N+1 1460 16 88.89
8 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 16.67
9 NS 2P E+2 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 HRISTOV Petko -VELIKOVA Rouja : 44,63 %10 NS 3C S+1 170 14 77.78
11 NS 1P E+1 -110 10 55.56
12 NS 1S S = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 40,00 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 15 83.33
17 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
18 NS 4C E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,07 %19 NS 3KcS-2 -300 0 0.00
20 NS 2C W = -110 13 72.22
21 NS 2P W+4 -230 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 %22 NS 3PcN-3 -500 12 66.67
23 NS 3P N = 140 16 88.89
24 NS 1K E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 %25 NS 2C S = 110 6 33.33
26 NS 2P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 66,85 %28 NS 3P N+1 170 3 16.67
29 NS 2P N-2 -200 5 27.78
30 NS 2S E+2 -180 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
12 VAGMAN David -NELIS Claude : 44,81 %31 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
32 NS 3C E = -140 9 50.00
33 NS 3S W = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 66,85 % 1 NS 4P S-5 -250 0 0.00
2 NS 2S S-1 -100 2 11.11
3 NS 2K S+1 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
12 VAGMAN David -NELIS Claude : 44,81 % 4 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 22.22
5 NS 3CcE = -530 0 0.00
6 NS 3CcN-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
22 COULIE Joelle -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,44 % 7 NS 4P N+2 680 2 11.11
8 NS 3P W = -140 3 16.67
9 NS 2P E+2 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,67 %10 NS 4CcS-1 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 2S W-1 50 16 88.89
12 NS 2C E = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -MACAUX Lucienne : 49,44 %13 NS 4P N-1 -100 8 44.44
14 NS 4K E-1 50 16 88.89
15 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,15 %19 NS 1S E-1 100 13 72.22
20 NS 3TcS-3 -800 0 0.00
21 NS 4P E+2 -480 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 40,00 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 3 16.67
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 3 16.67
24 NS 2C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,07 %25 NS 2P S = 110 6 33.33
26 NS 3T N+1 130 17 94.44
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 %28 NS 2P N+3 200 6 33.33
29 NS 2T S-2 -200 5 27.78
30 NS 2S W+1 -150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 %31 NS 2K S-1 -100 8 44.44
32 NS 2C E+1 -140 9 50.00
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 162,0 / 540 = 30,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 % 1 NS 2C S = 110 16 88.89
2 NS 1P E = -80 4 22.22
3 NS 1S S+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 % 4 NS 1S N+2 150 16 88.89
5 NS 2P S = 110 16 88.89
6 NS 2P W-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 66,85 % 7 NS 6P N+1 1460 16 88.89
8 NS 4T S-1 -50 12 66.67
9 NS 3P E+1 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
12 VAGMAN David -NELIS Claude : 44,81 %10 NS 2K E = -90 3 16.67
11 NS 2C N-2 -100 13 72.22
12 NS 3K N = 110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
22 COULIE Joelle -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,44 %13 NS 2P N+2 170 12 66.67
14 NS 3C W = -140 12 66.67
15 NS 3S N-3 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,67 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 15 83.33
17 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
18 NS 3C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 HRISTOV Petko -VELIKOVA Rouja : 44,63 %22 NS 3C W+1 -170 17 94.44
23 NS 3T E+1 -130 7 38.89
24 NS 2C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,15 %25 NS 2P S+1 140 15 83.33
26 NS 2P E = -110 1 5.56
27 NS 3S E = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 40,00 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67
29 NS 2S W-3 300 17 94.44
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,07 %31 NS 1S S = 90 13 72.22
32 NS 1S W+3 -180 2 11.11
33 NS 3S W = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 307,0 / 540 = 56,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 LIGOT Xavier -NELIS Anne
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 40,00 % 1 NS 2P S-2 -100 7 38.89
2 NS 1K S+1 90 8 44.44
3 NS 2K S+1 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,07 % 4 NS 2K E-1 100 10 55.56
5 NS 2C W+1 -140 7 38.89
6 NS 2C N = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 % 7 NS 4P N+3 710 8 44.44
8 NS 2P E = -110 9 50.00
9 NS 2P E+2 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 %10 NS 2C S+2 170 14 77.78
11 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
12 NS 3K N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 66,85 %13 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 11.11
14 NS 4C W-1 50 16 88.89
15 NS 3P W-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 VAGMAN David -NELIS Claude : 44,81 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
17 NS 5K N-1 -50 0 0.00
18 NS 4C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
22 COULIE Joelle -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,44 %19 NS 2C W+2 -170 3 16.67
20 NS 2C W = -110 13 72.22
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -MACAUX Lucienne : 49,44 %25 NS 2S S-3 -150 0 0.00
26 NS 2P E = -110 1 5.56
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
19 HRISTOV Petko -VELIKOVA Rouja : 44,63 %28 NS 4P N = 620 10 55.56
29 NS 2K E+2 -130 10 55.56
30 NS 1S E = -90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,15 %31 NS 2K S+1 110 16 88.89
32 NS 4C E-2 200 18 100.00
33 NS 2K E+3 -150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 254,0 / 540 = 47,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile
19 HRISTOV Petko -VELIKOVA Rouja : 44,63 % 1 NS 3P N-3 -150 2 11.11
2 NS 2P W-2 100 10 55.56
3 NS 2K S+2 130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,15 % 4 NS 3K E-1 100 10 55.56
5 NS 3C E+1 -170 4 22.22
6 NS 1S N+1 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 40,00 % 7 NS 6P N+1 1460 16 88.89
8 NS 3P W-2 100 15 83.33
9 NS 2P E+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,07 %10 NS 3C N+1 170 14 77.78
11 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
12 NS 3K N = 110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 %13 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 11.11
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22
15 NS 3S N-3 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 %16 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
17 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
18 NS 2C E = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 66,85 %19 NS 2C W+2 -170 3 16.67
20 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 27.78
21 NS 4P E+2 -480 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
12 VAGMAN David -NELIS Claude : 44,81 %22 NS 2C W+2 -170 17 94.44
23 NS 3S W-1 100 14 77.78
24 NS 3S W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,67 %28 NS 4P N+2 680 18 100.00
29 NS 3K E-1 100 14 77.78
30 NS 2C N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -MACAUX Lucienne : 49,44 %31 NS 2K S-1 -100 8 44.44
32 NS 4C E = -620 0 0.00
33 NS 3S W = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,67 % 1 NS 2P N-1 -50 13 72.22
2 NS 1S E-1 50 6 33.33
3 NS 2K N+2 130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -MACAUX Lucienne : 49,44 % 4 NS 3K E-1 100 10 55.56
5 NS 4CcE-3 500 18 100.00
6 NS 2C N+1 140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
19 HRISTOV Petko -VELIKOVA Rouja : 44,63 % 7 NS 4P N+2 680 2 11.11
8 NS 3P W = -140 3 16.67
9 NS 3P E+1 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 43,15 %10 NS 3C N = 140 7 38.89
11 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 22.22
12 NS 2S N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette : 40,00 %13 NS 4P N = 620 16 88.89
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 22.22
15 NS 4KcE-3 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 49,07 %16 NS 3S N+2 460 15 83.33
17 NS 4P N = 420 9 50.00
18 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 %19 NS 2P N-3 -150 7 38.89
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 27.78
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,00 %22 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 16.67
23 NS 3T E = -110 11 61.11
24 NS 2C N = 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 66,85 %25 NS 3C N = 140 15 83.33
26 NS 2P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 NS 3P E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
22 COULIE Joelle -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 54,44 %31 NS 1S N = 90 13 72.22
32 NS 4P N-2 -100 13 72.22
33 NS 2S E+1 -150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 289,0 / 540 = 53,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VAGMAN David -NELIS Claude
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,33 % 1 EO 1ScW-2 300 0 0.00
2 EO 1T E-3 150 1 5.56
3 EO 1S S+3 180 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
7 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 30,00 % 4 EO 2K E+1 -110 14 77.78
5 EO 3CcE = -530 18 100.00
6 EO 3CcN-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
2 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,26 % 7 EO 4P N+3 710 10 55.56
8 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 83.33
9 EO 3K N-3 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %10 EO 2K E = -90 15 83.33
11 EO 2C N-2 -100 5 27.78
12 EO 3K N = 110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,67 %13 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78
15 EO 2P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 LIGOT Xavier -NELIS Anne : 47,04 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
17 EO 5K N-1 -50 18 100.00
18 EO 4C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
4 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 57,78 %19 EO 2P W-1 100 5 27.78
20 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 72.22
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
10 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 50,19 %22 EO 2C W+2 -170 1 5.56
23 EO 3S W-1 100 4 22.22
24 EO 3S W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,48 %25 EO 2P S+1 140 3 16.67
26 EO 3T S+1 130 1 5.56
27 EO 4P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 48,89 %31 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
32 EO 3C E = -140 9 50.00
33 EO 3S W = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 242,0 / 540 = 44,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
7 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 30,00 % 1 EO 4P S-5 -250 18 100.00
2 EO 2S S-1 -100 16 88.89
3 EO 2K S+1 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
2 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,26 % 4 EO 2CcE = -670 16 88.89
5 EO 2C W+1 -140 11 61.11
6 EO 2C N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 % 7 EO 6P N+1 1460 2 11.11
8 EO 4T S-1 -50 6 33.33
9 EO 3P E+1 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,67 %10 EO 1S W = -90 15 83.33
11 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
12 EO 2C E = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
9 LIGOT Xavier -NELIS Anne : 47,04 %13 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 88.89
14 EO 4C W-1 50 2 11.11
15 EO 3P W-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 57,78 %16 EO 3S S = 400 16 88.89
17 EO 5K N = 400 16 88.89
18 EO 3C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 50,19 %19 EO 2C W+2 -170 15 83.33
20 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 72.22
21 EO 4P E+2 -480 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,48 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 15 83.33
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
24 EO 2C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,52 %25 EO 3C N = 140 3 16.67
26 EO 2P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 EO 3P E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 48,89 %28 EO 3P N+1 170 15 83.33
29 EO 2P N-2 -200 13 72.22
30 EO 2S E+2 -180 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 361,0 / 540 = 66,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 % 4 EO 1S N+2 150 2 11.11
5 EO 2P S = 110 2 11.11
6 EO 2P W-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,67 % 7 EO 5P S+2 710 10 55.56
8 EO 4P W-3 150 0 0.00
9 EO 3K S-3 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 LIGOT Xavier -NELIS Anne : 47,04 %10 EO 2C S+2 170 4 22.22
11 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
12 EO 3K N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 57,78 %13 EO 4P N-2 -200 16 88.89
14 EO 3S W = -400 8 44.44
15 EO 3P W-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 50,19 %16 EO 3S N-2 -100 18 100.00
17 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
18 EO 2C E = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,48 %19 EO 4K S-3 -150 11 61.11
20 EO 2C W = -110 5 27.78
21 EO 4P E+2 -480 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,52 %22 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 83.33
23 EO 3T E = -110 7 38.89
24 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 48,89 %25 EO 2C S = 110 12 66.67
26 EO 2P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 EO 3S E+3 -490 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,33 %28 EO 2P N+2 170 15 83.33
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 6 33.33
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
7 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 30,00 %31 EO 2K S-1 -100 10 55.56
32 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 50.00
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 297,0 / 540 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 % 1 EO 2C S = 110 2 11.11
2 EO 1P E = -80 14 77.78
3 EO 1S S+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 LIGOT Xavier -NELIS Anne : 47,04 % 7 EO 4P N+3 710 10 55.56
8 EO 2P E = -110 9 50.00
9 EO 2P E+2 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
4 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 57,78 %10 EO 2C S+2 170 4 22.22
11 EO 2C N-2 -100 5 27.78
12 EO 3K N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
10 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 50,19 %13 EO 4P N-2 -200 16 88.89
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78
15 EO 3S N-3 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,48 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
17 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
18 EO 3C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,52 %19 EO 2P N-3 -150 11 61.11
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 72.22
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 48,89 %22 EO 3PcN-3 -500 6 33.33
23 EO 3P N = 140 2 11.11
24 EO 1K E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,33 %25 EO 2C N = 110 12 66.67
26 EO 2P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 30,00 %28 EO 2P N+3 200 12 66.67
29 EO 2T S-2 -200 13 72.22
30 EO 2S W+1 -150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
2 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,26 %31 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
32 EO 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22
33 EO 3S W = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 302,0 / 540 = 55,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,67 % 1 EO 3P N-2 -100 11 61.11
2 EO 1T E-3 150 1 5.56
3 EO 3K S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 LIGOT Xavier -NELIS Anne : 47,04 % 4 EO 2K E-1 100 8 44.44
5 EO 2C W+1 -140 11 61.11
6 EO 2C N = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 50,19 %10 EO 3C N+1 170 4 22.22
11 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
12 EO 3K N = 110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,48 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 55.56
14 EO 3S W-1 50 2 11.11
15 EO 3S N-3 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,52 %16 EO 3S N+2 460 3 16.67
17 EO 4P N = 420 9 50.00
18 EO 3C E = -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 48,89 %19 EO 3KcS-2 -300 18 100.00
20 EO 2C W = -110 5 27.78
21 EO 2P W+4 -230 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,33 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 15 83.33
23 EO 3K W = -110 7 38.89
24 EO 3T E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 30,00 %25 EO 2P S = 110 12 66.67
26 EO 3T N+1 130 1 5.56
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,26 %28 EO 4P N+1 650 3 16.67
29 EO 2P S-2 -200 13 72.22
30 EO 2P E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %31 EO 1S S = 90 5 27.78
32 EO 1S W+3 -180 16 88.89
33 EO 3S W = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 265,0 / 540 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -GROSFILS Colette
9 LIGOT Xavier -NELIS Anne : 47,04 % 1 EO 2P S-2 -100 11 61.11
2 EO 1K S+1 90 10 55.56
3 EO 2K S+1 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 57,78 % 4 EO 3K E-2 200 0 0.00
5 EO 2T S-1 -100 8 44.44
6 EO 3C N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 50,19 % 7 EO 6P N+1 1460 2 11.11
8 EO 3P W-2 100 3 16.67
9 EO 2P E+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,52 %13 EO 4P N = 620 2 11.11
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 77.78
15 EO 4KcE-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 48,89 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 3 16.67
17 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
18 EO 4C E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,33 %19 EO 3P W-3 300 0 0.00
20 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 72.22
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
7 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 30,00 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 15 83.33
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 15 83.33
24 EO 2C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
2 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,26 %25 EO 2P S+1 140 3 16.67
26 EO 2P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33
29 EO 2S W-3 300 1 5.56
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,67 %31 EO 1P W+2 -140 16 88.89
32 EO 4C E-1 100 2 11.11
33 EO 2K E+1 -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 216,0 / 540 = 40,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
4 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 57,78 % 1 EO 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78
2 EO 2K S+1 110 6 33.33
3 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
10 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 50,19 % 4 EO 3K E-1 100 8 44.44
5 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 77.78
6 EO 1S N+1 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,48 % 7 EO 6P N = 1430 6 33.33
8 EO 3PcW-1 100 3 16.67
9 EO 2P E+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,52 %10 EO 3C N = 140 11 61.11
11 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 77.78
12 EO 2S N-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,33 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 3 16.67
17 EO 6S N = 990 0 0.00
18 EO 4C E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
7 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 30,00 %19 EO 1S E-1 100 5 27.78
20 EO 3TcS-3 -800 18 100.00
21 EO 4P E+2 -480 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
2 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,26 %22 EO 3C W+2 -200 4 22.22
23 EO 4T W = -130 11 61.11
24 EO 2S E = -120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %25 EO 2P S+1 140 3 16.67
26 EO 2P E = -110 17 94.44
27 EO 3S E = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,67 %28 EO 1S S+1 120 18 100.00
29 EO 3S W-3 300 1 5.56
30 EO 3S W = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 LIGOT Xavier -NELIS Anne : 47,04 %31 EO 2K S+1 110 2 11.11
32 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00
33 EO 2K E+3 -150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 233,0 / 540 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 HRISTOV Petko -VELIKOVA Rouja
10 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 50,19 % 1 EO 3P N-3 -150 16 88.89
2 EO 2P W-2 100 8 44.44
3 EO 2K S+2 130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,48 % 4 EO 3CcE = -730 18 100.00
5 EO 3CcW-1 100 4 22.22
6 EO 2C N = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,52 % 7 EO 4P N+2 680 16 88.89
8 EO 3P W = -140 15 83.33
9 EO 3P E+1 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 48,89 %10 EO 3C S+1 170 4 22.22
11 EO 1P E+1 -110 8 44.44
12 EO 1S S = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,33 %13 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 55.56
14 EO 4C E = -420 10 55.56
15 EO 3P W-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,26 %19 EO 2S E = -120 8 44.44
20 EO 2P E-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %22 EO 3C W+1 -170 1 5.56
23 EO 3T E+1 -130 11 61.11
24 EO 2C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,67 %25 EO 2P S = 110 12 66.67
26 EO 2P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 LIGOT Xavier -NELIS Anne : 47,04 %28 EO 4P N = 620 8 44.44
29 EO 2K E+2 -130 8 44.44
30 EO 1S E = -90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 57,78 %31 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00
32 EO 3PcS-1 -100 5 27.78
33 EO 3K E+1 -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
Total : 241,0 / 540 = 44,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 CHANTRAINE René -MACAUX Lucienne
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,48 % 1 EO 2K N-2 -100 11 61.11
2 EO 1S N+1 120 4 22.22
3 EO 3K S+1 130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,52 % 4 EO 3K E-1 100 8 44.44
5 EO 4CcE-3 500 0 0.00
6 EO 2C N+1 140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 48,89 % 7 EO 6P N+1 1460 2 11.11
8 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 83.33
9 EO 2P E+2 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,33 %10 EO 2C N+2 170 4 22.22
11 EO 1S W-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 1S S = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
7 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 30,00 %13 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 55.56
14 EO 4K E-1 50 2 11.11
15 EO 4C S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,26 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
17 EO 3S N+3 490 2 11.11
18 EO 3S E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,67 %22 EO 4C W = -620 9 50.00
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 15 83.33
24 EO 3T E = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
9 LIGOT Xavier -NELIS Anne : 47,04 %25 EO 2S S-3 -150 18 100.00
26 EO 2P E = -110 17 94.44
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
4 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 57,78 %28 EO 4P S+1 650 3 16.67
29 EO 3T S-2 -200 13 72.22
30 EO 3K E+2 -150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
10 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 50,19 %31 EO 2K S-1 -100 10 55.56
32 EO 4C E = -620 18 100.00
33 EO 3S W = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,52 % 1 EO 2P N-1 -50 5 27.78
2 EO 1S E-1 50 12 66.67
3 EO 2K N+2 130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 48,89 % 4 EO 3K E-1 100 8 44.44
5 EO 2C W-1 50 6 33.33
6 EO 3C N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,33 % 7 EO 4P N+2 680 16 88.89
8 EO 2P W = -110 9 50.00
9 EO 1P E+3 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
7 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 30,00 %10 EO 4CcS-1 -200 18 100.00
11 EO 2S W-1 50 2 11.11
12 EO 2C E = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
2 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,26 %13 EO 4P N = 620 2 11.11
14 EO 4C W+1 -450 18 100.00
15 EO 4P E-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 3 16.67
17 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
18 EO 3C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,67 %19 EO 3C W-2 200 2 11.11
20 EO 2C W = -110 5 27.78
21 EO 5P E+1 -480 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 57,78 %25 EO 2P S = 110 12 66.67
26 EO 2P E-1 100 9 50.00
27 EO 2S W+2 -180 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
10 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 50,19 %28 EO 4P N+2 680 0 0.00
29 EO 3K E-1 100 4 22.22
30 EO 2C N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,48 %31 EO 2S N-1 -100 10 55.56
32 EO 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22
33 EO 3K E+2 -150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 COULIE Joelle -WANDERPEPEN Janine
6 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 48,89 % 1 EO 4C N-2 -100 11 61.11
2 EO 1S S-2 -200 18 100.00
3 EO 1S S+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,33 % 4 EO 3K E-1 100 8 44.44
5 EO 2CcW = -470 16 88.89
6 EO 2C N+1 140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 VERBOIS Léon -COLLET Claudine : 30,00 % 7 EO 4P N+2 680 16 88.89
8 EO 3P W = -140 15 83.33
9 EO 2P E+2 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
2 CASSART Guy -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,26 %10 EO 3C S = 140 11 61.11
11 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
12 EO 3K N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %13 EO 2P N+2 170 6 33.33
14 EO 3C W = -140 6 33.33
15 EO 3S N-3 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 46,67 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
17 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
18 EO 4C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 LIGOT Xavier -NELIS Anne : 47,04 %19 EO 2C W+2 -170 15 83.33
20 EO 2C W = -110 5 27.78
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
4 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 57,78 %22 EO 4C W = -620 9 50.00
23 EO 5KcW-2 500 0 0.00
24 EO 1S E = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,48 %28 EO 2P N+4 230 10 55.56
29 EO 3T S-4 -400 18 100.00
30 EO 2K E+1 -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,52 %31 EO 1S N = 90 5 27.78
32 EO 4P N-2 -100 5 27.78
33 EO 2S E+1 -150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 294,0 / 540 = 54,44 %
|
|